Photo courtesy of Zoe Dubelier ’23
On Mar. 8 at approximately 1 p.m.,149 faculty members voted no confidence in President Katherine Bergeron, while 11 expressed confidence and 8 abstained. 88.6% of faculty members have now officially joined the broader community which has strongly protested against Bergeron throughout the last two weeks. Based on the results of this vote, it is clear that the Connecticut College community is ready to part ways with Bergeron.
A faculty vote of no confidence is not binding, as it does not hold the power to remove the president. It is, however, an official statement from the faculty that they do not support Bergeron as the president of the College, and lack confidence in her ability to do what is best for Conn as an institution.
This official vote is unprecedented in the history of the College. In 2000, 78 of 105 tenured professors, approximately 75%, signed a letter in opposition of former President Claire Gaudiani. This contributed to the movement that led to her resignation. Today, SVE released a statement reaffirming their demand that Bergeron resigns.
With this vote, the fourth Fanning takeover in College history continues to surpass the timeline and scope of any previous movement. Students have occupied the building for 10 full days, while the everyday operations of the College, both academic and extracurricular, have been greatly disrupted. Although the administration has taken steps to address the demands put forth by SVE, the campus community has not accepted the piecemeal nature of their response. Students, faculty, and staff continue to speak out, through votes, testimonies and physical protest, with the goal of meeting all eight demands and making Conn a more equal and inclusive college.
Update:
DRAFT RESOLUTION OF NO CONFIDENCE IN THE PRESIDENT OF CONNECTICUT COLLEGE Updated Tuesday 3/7/2023:
“WHEREAS the faculty are fully committed to and believe in making Connecticut College an inclusive and equitable community for all to work and learn;
WHEREAS actions and inactions by President Katherine Bergeron have precipitated among faculty a growing mistrust and loss of faith in her ability to lead and represent Connecticut College;
WHEREAS the Connecticut College community can no longer function effectively while DRAFT
Katherine Bergeron is president;
WHEREAS President Katherine Bergeron’s lack of collaborative leadership has resulted in an inability to retain senior administrators, especially a Dean of Institutional Equity and Inclusion;
WHEREAS the faculty have communicated concerns about the President’s actions to the Board of Trustees without remedy;
WHEREAS the faculty have the responsibility once again to urge the Board of Trustees to fulfill their charge and duty to guide Connecticut College through these troubling times; therefore, be it
RESOLVED, that we, the faculty of Connecticut College, formally declare that we have no confidence in the leadership of President Katherine Bergeron.
RESOLVED, that we, the faculty of Connecticut College, call upon the Board of Trustees to provide a prompt announcement of President Katherine Bergeron’s transition from office and the immediate appointment of an acting president.”
Alright now! Thank you, faculty!
It is clear Pres. Bergeron is not the person for this moment. It is time to set ego aside and resign – well past time. Bergeron’s cognitive dissonance is alarming, yet not surprising given the institutional power supporting her behind the scenes.
Also, the Board of Trustees clearly needs a shake-up and redirection. How have they been so removed from the College and this moment? They must have known these problems were stirring.
As an alum and someone who was active in changing the institution for lgbtq+ bipoc students from 2005-2007, it is frightening to witness how moments like these repeat themselves.
Fight on! oh, and also follow the money. It’ll reveal it all.
– Nik ’07
Thank you faculty!!! Current and former parents are grateful.
88%. Please BofT: step in now and in a public way to show confident, competent leadership. This presidency is not sustainable. Our college needs the underlying issues addressed and to move forward.
I’m seriously beginning to question the BoT’s ability to deal with a crisis. If this is the level of of responsiveness we can expect, I’m seriously disappointed. Especially with aime of the serious issues raised (outsude of the Dean King issue). What kind of stranglehold does KB have on them?
I wise individual once said “If enough people call you a horse, buy a saddle”